2007-04-09, 23:37 | Link #61 | |||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Quote:
So far, I've seen the first episode, and I hated it. I saw a clip of the second episode, and I hated that as well. What are the merits of the other episodes? Off-topic: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
|||||
2007-04-10, 04:03 | Link #62 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
|
Quote:
Quote:
And no, high tech equipment does not replicate ghosts, psyshic auras, brain frying ability. I have no idea where you got this from. Again, you seem to be confusing the issue here - nobody cares whether you think the abilities are dumb, or whether you like certain aspect of the shows. What is of significance here is that the newtype abilities were very impressive (in terms of power) to the point of rendering him invincible , and reliable enough to kick in every time they were really needed for his survival (and sometimes even for others, since Kamille can apparently sense danger from remote bombs). I have no idea where you got the impression that Newtype abilities such as brain frying by being next to an enemy, impenetrable shields, psychic auras, or borrowing ghost power could be replicated by simple machinery. I suspect that you may need to rewatch the show to refresh your memories. Last edited by avmoghe; 2007-04-10 at 04:13. |
||
2007-04-10, 08:52 | Link #64 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Quote:
Quote:
The element that seems to qualify MS Igloo is the fact that the episodes take place during the One Year War, which is already a well-established conflict. Off-topic: Quote:
Quote:
I admit that my comment about the forcefield being dumb isn't particularly relevant.
__________________
|
||||
2007-04-10, 09:33 | Link #65 | |
Retweet Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ニュー・オーリンズ、LA
|
Quote:
As for MS Igloo he's clearly talking about mood and atmosphere condusive to the feeling of a more strict war-setting...Oh because you hated Igloo ep 1 it doesn't count to be examined? What kind of logic is that? Your trying to out-argue someone who has seen what you haven't...Jesus, for the entirety of this thread poster after poster has conceded that Gundam on the whole isn't really representative of "war-anime" in the obtuse terms you have applied...So now you just wanna rape the next layer of it's content by taking the many aspects that make Gundam Gundam and trivialize that aswell? (i.e. The ghost thing, brain fry thing) Gundam is not for you, don't you realize that by now?
__________________
|
|
2007-04-10, 11:59 | Link #66 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Quote:
Off-topic: Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
2007-04-10, 16:45 | Link #67 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
|
Quote:
I won't continue since I think I've said everything I've needed to say. |
|
2007-04-10, 18:41 | Link #68 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Wing did it more than any other series, but the Seed series did it slightly. This is partially why i enjoy Wing a lot more than some of the other series. most of what Zeta showed was fighting, and some planning. That alone doesn't make much for war. Even if a lot of people died.
__________________
|
|
2007-04-18, 15:28 | Link #69 | ||||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Apologies for the long absence, unfortunately i didn't have alot of time to reply these past weeks. Work and watching Gundam ZZ like a marathon doesn't leave time for much else...
Quote:
Anyway, i'm tired of picking at 4tran's argument. Obviously 4Tran and my definition of war-anime aren't the same. I just find it humourous that everytime I bring up a specific detail in the anime to backup my argument, 4Tran just shifts his definition around so I have to provide more examples. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
What's so real world about Zeta? Lets see, just about everything is based on real concepts. You bring up Seed and Wing, I think comparing these two series to the UC ones will highlight the realism that UC brings. Besides the newtype fireworks at the end of each series, the Gundams aren't excessively or unrealistically overpowering. And Zeta, unlike MSG, had a protagonist that also had his butt saved numerous times by his own comrades, unlike Amuro. Those are just a few examples. But I mean besides all this talk of galactic heroes (which I've yet to watch), what and how many other series can you say is more of a war-anime than Gundam? |
||||
2007-04-19, 04:44 | Link #72 | |
Pilot of the "Gundam"
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 35
|
Quote:
The U.C. Gundam series are the most realistic ones when it comes to MS specs, war and morality. Tomino really put a lot of effort in keeping the focus of the show into the characters' thoughts and principles which made the show and intense war drama. Tomino showed that war really has no sides and that each side would end up in the worst way possible. War is not just about big guns, cool tricks, and skillful men and women; it's all about how people strive in just staying alive. U.C. Gundam series showed a lot of this and this is all true. Many people try to stay away from the conflict, do stupid things just for something, and in fact support even the most drastic of all measures. And when it comes to viewing civilian views about the wars, U.C. is the closest thing you get in making it real. |
|
2007-04-19, 08:53 | Link #73 | |||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
|||||||||
2007-04-19, 09:37 | Link #74 | |
Retweet Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ニュー・オーリンズ、LA
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2007-04-19, 10:03 | Link #75 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
wingdarkness, you don't seem to grasp the concept of irony. Zeta's depiction of the "atmosphere" of war is wrong, hence any such statements referring to it as a reflection of what it's like is contradictory. Since what Camille says about war is completely wrong, so the implication is that either he has no idea what it's like (despite supposedly fighting in one), or that the creators don't. By the way, if you define Zeta as "essentially a soap-opera//space-drama themed to realistic mecha...", then you seem to agree that it shouldn't count as a war anime.
__________________
|
2007-04-19, 10:26 | Link #76 | |||||||||||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And Full Metal Panic? Isn't that just totally contradictory to ALL your definitions of a war-anime? Or maybe you're referring to the manga because i've only seen the anime. My definition, while it may be off topic, are simply that it has to portray war in a realistic/believable manner. This is what separates UC Gundam from most of its AU, specifically CE counterparts. Because while UC is based on plausible concepts (legrange points, minovsky particles, designs for space colonies) and the majority of the plot and motivations for each character is fully fleshed out, the CE is basically a super robot anime in a very superficial/shallow Gundam setting. Anyway, I don't think continuing this line of questioning is getting us anywhere. It's clear IMO that your standards for the stated requirements are infinitely and perhaps impossibly greater than my standards for those requirements. I can't find F91, so I'm gonna watch Victory and then try and get myself some Galactic Heroes. Quote:
|
|||||||||||
2007-04-19, 10:38 | Link #77 | ||
Retweet Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ニュー・オーリンズ、LA
|
Quote:
Quote:
As for Cammille how in God's name can you assess what's completely wrong? Have you ever been in a mobile suit battle? "Is this what war is?" This is the question asked by a kid seeing unbridled blood on the battlefield...Who is forced to kill and struggles with the areas of grey when it comes to the choice of killing and protecting (Many instances having to kill those he has feelings toward) Do you incorporate any sense of humanity into your equations? Boy such arrogance thinking you actually know how to incorporate a strategy for for creating a genre defining anime morso than those who did so? Remember the realistic mecha genre exists...Your Macro-Military SOOOPA war documentary strategic strategem genre hasn't seen much light if I'm being frank...There's a reason for that... Awaits your next post of bloviation to match my own...
__________________
|
||
2007-04-19, 12:52 | Link #78 | ||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Are you sure that the Zeta crew were civilians? Most if not all joined the AEUG at some point or another. I'll have to go check to verify that for sure. Quote:
Quote:
ZZ i didn't have problems with any of the battles, or MSG for that matter. I had the same problem with Victory, but even then those battles had thier great moments. Quote:
Zeta gundam i don't recall suffered much damage, but i'll go marathon the series to be sure. ZZ gundam didn't suffer much damage, except at the end of the show. the most damage i think that was inflicted is when judau fought with rakan for the first time. MKII and Hyakushi were damaged on diffrent occasions, but even then none of those were the main characters unit. F91 didn't suffer much damage, but that was a movie. Victory gundam was trashed dozens of times, but they always seemed to have spare parts for it, and it's parts were destroyed on several occasions, and replaced in the same ep. you have failed to point out anything realistic about zeta. The politics weren't all there. Titans hunting Zeeks, latter trying to ally with them, even though they were suppose to be hunting them. Not to mention the whole premise of the AEUG and how it was started doesn't fit either. Char's speech to dakar is utter garbage, you would think he would have been arrested for war crimes from the first war. I mean he was one of the biggest aces of the oyw, but nothing happens and i don't see many goverments just letting someone like him walk away scott free.
__________________
|
||||
2007-04-19, 13:14 | Link #79 | |
Retweet Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: ニュー・オーリンズ、LA
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2007-04-19, 14:09 | Link #80 | |||||||||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
|
Quote:
Moreover, even if your accusation were true, it's still not an example of shifting definitions. Quote:
"But why would Haman betray AEUG?" "I thought that Char's speech was pure drivel, and the Titans' response to it was moronic" "AEUG is short handed, but why?" "my question is how many Titans are left outside of the final battle" ...and so on. Are these specific enough for you? I'm not even sure why you're digging up the points I made in the previous post, especially since they're explicitly not what I was referring to as the "specific issues". (Heck, two of them weren't even referring to Zeta; they were about Gundam in general.) As a side note, I'm usually less critical of characters doing boneheaded things - characters are (usually) human, and they're entitled to making mistakes. I'm only riled up about it if they were presented as competent. Quote:
"You bring up Seed and Wing, I think comparing these two series to the UC ones will highlight the realism that UC brings." - at best, you can show that Seed and Wing are unrealistic. "Besides the newtype fireworks at the end of each series, the Gundams aren't excessively or unrealistically overpowering." - doesn't show how everything in Zeta is based on real concepts. "And Zeta, unlike MSG, had a protagonist that also had his butt saved numerous times by his own comrades, unlike Amuro." - at best, you can show that Mobile Suit Gundam is less realistic. "Those are just a few examples. But I mean besides all this talk of galactic heroes (which I've yet to watch), what and how many other series can you say is more of a war-anime than Gundam?" - doesn't relate to your point. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|