2013-03-28, 06:22 | Link #1 |
Deadpan Rambler
|
"Kadokawa to Merge 9 Subsidiaries Into 1 Company" - From ANN
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news...into-1-company
This is what I feared for... Looks like Shana can rub shoulders with Lina Inverse, Louise, and Haruhi Suzumiya side-by-side. But hey, a crossover would be a possibility! Any reaction to this move by Kadokawa? |
2013-03-28, 08:04 | Link #4 | |
Deadpan Rambler
|
Quote:
Since it all comes down to this, I hope it doesn't affect the licensing of their light novels (and other merchandise) outside Japan. |
|
2013-03-28, 08:15 | Link #5 |
Nyahahahaha♥
|
It shouldn't affect licensing since Kadokawa is pretty aggressive at licensing them outside Japan to begin with. In regards to the NA market, the revenue for LNs appear to be about the same as the revenue for manga volumes, but with higher TL costs so it's not profitable for publishers outside certain titles.
__________________
|
2013-03-28, 09:26 | Link #6 |
Deadpan Rambler
|
They could bring their novels worldwide by buying Yen Press and turn into Kadokawa Shoten USA... But then again, there's already an American branch there!
Now then, there's a problem when it comes to media distribution. The management needs to sort it out instead of making factions like "Team Dengeki Bunko" vs "Team Fujimi Shobo" or something. |
2013-03-28, 11:44 | Link #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
|
Quote:
|
|
2013-03-28, 13:40 | Link #11 | |
The Voice of Reason
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Age: 47
|
Quote:
As for the merger itself, considering these companies more or less belonged to Kadokawa anyway, I guess this move makes sense businesd-wise.
__________________
|
|
2013-03-28, 16:27 | Link #12 |
temporary safeguard
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Germany
|
This is too complicated.
Can someone explain what exactly is the difference between being a 'subsidiarie'' and joining the mother company? Isn't this splitting all just legal mumbo jumbo to get around taxes and stuff? In the end, what the mother company says is law anyways right? |
2013-03-28, 16:55 | Link #13 | |
Honya-kun
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clinton, Maryland
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2013-03-30, 13:44 | Link #15 | |
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 41
|
Quote:
Since a lot of these brands started off as separate companies that later got bought out, it may be that this points to continued consolidation on the staff level too, and more common practices throughout the company. There can be benefits in keeping separate teams each doing their own things, but also efficiencies in combining teams. As they combine/move staff across the subsidiaries, it will have some impact on the products they produce too. Some time down the road, we may see some of the various magazines be consolidated/eliminated/streamlined by eliminated the less-popular ones and moving the associated content to the more-popular ones. You'll probably also see a lot of tweaking to names too, as they try to put the Kadokawa brand on everything. In the end, though, probably not too big of an impact on consumers right away, and not really more or less than could have been done already even if they kept all the old names. In the past I sort of thought that they were keeping these brands just to give the perception of increased competition in the market, but really so much of the industry is (already) run by one giant company. Now that'll just be more obvious to us.
__________________
|
|
2013-03-31, 23:53 | Link #17 | |
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Age: 41
|
Quote:
But I suppose one could argue that, effectively speaking, Kadokawa is already the "super LN publishing brand" now.
__________________
|
|
2013-04-02, 06:32 | Link #18 | |
Deadpan Rambler
|
Quote:
And BTW, will Kadokawa name it as Sneaker Bunko or Beans Bunko? |
|
|
|