2013-09-30, 19:02 | Link #1301 | |||||
Angelerator
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canada
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
|||||
2013-09-30, 19:25 | Link #1302 | |
Senior Member
Author
|
Quote:
Hhmmmm... That's an interesting take on her character, at least. There is a certain charm and emotional poignancy to it. Thank you for sharing it. After reading your take, I do think that this is what Episode 22 was probably aiming for, but the execution could have been a bit better. I don't mind Mikoto taking risks, and being willing to endanger herself to help others. This is why I could roll with her eating Telestina's candy (that was actually an almost badass hero moment, really). But there should be limits here. I'd rather Mikoto not come off as the female equivalent of a very bull-headed shounen male lead that throws caution to the wind by always going with his gut (without first consulting his brain). I'd like her to be a bit smarter than that.
__________________
|
|
2013-09-30, 19:39 | Link #1303 | |
I’m sorry, Kamijou-san!!
Join Date: May 2013
Location: California
|
Quote:
What? Spoiler for NT 7:
The comparison is that Mikoto needs to protect Febri and is therefore willing to believe that the bad guy isn't completely evil, just disenfranchised or something, and will keep his word partly because she's important as the railgun to the city and has that protection in a way and will keep his word because he isn't a ruthless killer. She kind of implied that even Accelerator wasn't a ruthless killer... in episode 24... Ok fine. That may be true. I was somewhat BS-ing there (That was the one example I could come up with, but since the time Kamachi wrote the material for both is around the same time, I would see why this example would be a good one...) I didn't mean an idealist was an idiot, even though it can be kind of true at times... I meant that she was being in the idiot in the sense that she was believing in the good of other people, and that since all she could do to save febri at that point in time from her point of view was to let the injection happen and to involve her friends and to trust Terestina, she did it. It's not about being smart, it's about not having any other choices. What I mean by not having other choices isn't about saying that I'm doomed to give up, what I mean by not having other choices is about rather trying her best to save her friend even if it meant taking the injection. Furthermore, Touma didn't think Mikoto was evil, because she was his friend he immediately thought that she was the good guy even though there was no reason to do this. Why did he believe in her, because he was her friend. It wasn't because of anything except for the fact that he believes in the good of humanity even against overwhelming evidence. This has come up time and time again, so don't try to say that isn't true. :__: That's part of my point. This is why Mikoto can suddenly believe that this guy won't kill her and will stay true to his word. How else is she supposed to save Febri in this situation? Zaarael told us Js06 said that Kamachi provided a lot of the major story details for this arc. Furthermore, let me give you some more implications as to why I believe this arc was written by Kamachi. Let's list a long list of different types of evidence that I found. Spoiler for Evidence that Silent Party was written by Kamachi (other than the fact that the name for the arc was evidently constructed by him) lolol:
THAT makes me think Kamachi must have supplied a lot of these details, because these important themes mentioned were highlighted in a way that kind of made it clear they weren't accidents. This is why I think Kamachi was actively involved in writing this arc... @Triple_R Thanks for that. I guess I should be a little more careful in saying this is only my opinion But yes, this was what I thought they were going for the entire time after I saw it with subtitles... and it's kind of why I didn't just assume it was poorly written. I do agree though that it probably could have been executed at least somewhat better. Last edited by dniv; 2013-09-30 at 19:50. |
|
2013-09-30, 21:01 | Link #1306 | ||||
Angelerator
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canada
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Spoiler for Length:
*deep breath* All of this is nothing but at best circumstantial evidence that ignores all of the very un-Kamachi things that happened. Let me make a list of my own Spoiler for My list:
All of this points to Kamachi having just given the key points of the arc. I get that you're trying to like the arc but that doesn't mean you should just pretend all of the bad stuff didn't happen and everything was planned. It is what it is. God that was a lot of writing for a single post.
__________________
|
||||
2013-10-01, 09:14 | Link #1307 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Spain
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Spoiler for Long list:
Dniv, instead of posting more arguments first why don't you try to explain why do you think ours are wrong (one by one please, easy with the walls of text) and we can start from there |
|||
2013-10-06, 20:24 | Link #1308 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Puerto Rico
Age: 34
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2013-10-06, 20:33 | Link #1309 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
Quote:
|
|
2013-10-06, 22:30 | Link #1311 |
お姉さん☆
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto, ON
Age: 31
|
Fans on either side will pick point(s) and use that, obviously. Especially evident in shipping wars.
Plus, picking on each other, lol. In regards to the crossover, I was happy he used specifically Touma and Mikoto for it and not someone else. That's how I saw it. |
2014-05-01, 14:32 | Link #1313 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2012
|
Quote:
@ACertainStark Because she sells, she is a marketing figure obviously, it doesn't matters if it's comedic, at the end, the characters aren't out of themselves and talk what they would within the series, it's been done for Kamachi for a reason, I find contradictory to take Narita's SS as canon but then dismiss one Kamachi himself wrote. |
|
|
|