2014-01-01, 12:29 | Link #81 | |
Working Hard
Join Date: Sep 2012
|
Quote:
Thanks for pointing out. That's the key. The real world must be fake... Or... let's go to the extreme and said that "the adventurer memory of the real world is the fake one". Since they are just a data in the database, it'll easy to alter their memory. Plant a fake story about living in real world. Then at the predetermined time, when the catastrophe/apocalypse happen, give them an illusion of sucked to the Elder Tale world. |
|
2014-01-01, 12:45 | Link #82 | |
Sensei, aishite imasu
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hong Kong Shatterdome
|
Quote:
The only reason I brought this up was because if someone has the tech to make strong AI for the people of the land to inhabit this stupidly sophisticated Matrix simulation...why would you assume the tech gods running it couldn't also scan a persons memory, and construct believable copies of a humans friends from his memories? It doesn't need to be a perfect copy. Just be believable to the person you did the memory scan on. Adventurers should be TERRIFIED of the idea that People of the Land are hyper sophisticated bots in a computer simulation. If the People of the Land are soulless digital automatons, than the adventurer standing next to you could be one to.
__________________
|
|
2014-01-01, 15:04 | Link #83 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
2014-01-01, 15:31 | Link #84 | ||
Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
|
Quote:
On the other hand, the virtual reality theory has an easy time explaining the game elements and even why they no longer fully conform to the base game (the unintended consequence of a mass upgrade/patch/Plot Device is that you can cause a system to expand/corrupt beyond your initial projection). It has a crap time explaining the transportation though. Landers are actually a good example of this conundrum. On the one hand the virtual reality thing has to explain why they have sentience (while it's both easy and hard depending on which end of the hard/soft sci-fi scale you point to, I mean more why they gained it at all in the first place), where as the magic thing has to explain why they're entwined in the game elements as well. This is what I mean by both are equally valid, or invalid, since on the balance of wholes, explaining the scenario in a satisfactory way (which, for me, does not include something as simplistic as "magic did it" or "the technobabble MacGuffin did it") requires enough exposition time and effort that you can cover either scenario. Quote:
A lot of sci-fi, mostly those that deal with artificial intelligences, start from the base of real world science in a modern, or closely modern (within under 30 years) science, and how things progress into the sci-fi scope is that the eureka moment have nothing to do with somebody actually doing anything but rather something happening to cause an "unintended consequence." For example, the Fantastic Four go up into space to study a cosmic event and somehow gain super powers from exposure to it and yet the fantastical end result didn't involve anything beyond a space ship which at the time of the original creation were in existence. These plots have little to do with the technological base and everything to do with a confluence of events which, depending on the plot, cause things to go horribly... in some direction at any rate. The Singularity, a sci-fi concept which somewhat pertains to real life, speculates that if you can create an AI which is smarter than humans then it's evolutionary growth rate could accelerate beyond human comprehension via bootstrapping; in essence allowing for the development and acquisition of deus ex machina levels of technology within extremely short periods of time (depending on plot this could mean a time period of years to, in one case, hours). This pertains to real life in that arguably the greatest challenge in creating an AI is not hardware but software limitations meaning that, from one lens, we have the technology to create a "true" AI and if we do we could initiate a technological singularity. I'm not postulating that this is Log Horizon's reasoning but rather that you can have a base reality with technology comparable to our own and still plausibly introduce sufficiently advanced technology if you spend the time explaining your reasoning. Just like how you can have a universe without magic have magic suddenly show up/influence it. |
||
2014-01-01, 15:43 | Link #85 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
|
So far human brain exceed in metter of computing capacity every supercomputer on this world and we talking about hundred thousands of AI that are indistinguishable from normal person in settings that is no different from our present time.
As was mentioned there is also thousand players that would be have to be putten into virtual reality. Such action would require monitore all players check who instal new update and kidnap them in moment they log in. Another possibility is some mircovave VR from satelites that can pitpoint every single person that meets these condition. I can accept possibility that Elder tales game was transformed into world or that it was own world all along and game is just mirror of it, instead of paralel world theory, but Virtual reality is far more farfetched than ANY fantasy scenario. |
2014-01-01, 16:02 | Link #86 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
|
Quote:
Also I'm personally I'm not convinced of either theory since both seem impossible really I tend to favor the VR one myself just because all the game mechanic stuff rolls along a little bit easier thinking that. |
|
2014-01-01, 16:23 | Link #88 | ||
Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
|
Quote:
Ultimately though the point was not "the Singularity works" but rather whether the origin world's history diverges from our own and in what way. The limitation is not in the base level of technology but rather in if that divergence exists and how it manifests. Quote:
|
||
2014-01-01, 16:46 | Link #90 | ||
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
Quote:
But that aside, it remains a case of "evidence versus no evidence." Unless the novel shows us something different, we have no reason to assume the events happening in the manga aren't real. Quote:
|
||
2014-01-01, 16:57 | Link #91 | |||
Sensei, aishite imasu
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hong Kong Shatterdome
|
Quote:
Quote:
The virtual reality theory...can't really be properly investigated. All it does is open up a whole can of worms. Like the fact that if People of the Land can be AI simulations, there's no reason that other Adventurers can't be simulations. How exactly do you determine whether or not you're in the Matrix, especially when all the people around you might be just part of the simulation? ...though lets keep in mind. If the Adventurers are trying to reconcile the existence of "game mechanics" in a fantasy world they suddenly emerged in, and they're willing to doubt their sensory input, there's a stupidly easy explanation. The Adventurers weren't transported here. The automaton like Adventurers who populated Elder Tales simply all gained self-awareness, along with a false set of memories. This theory doesn't require reconciliation between the "game mechanics" in Elder Tales and the actual Game mechanics of Elder Tales. The memories of Elder Tales the game are just the new Adventurers being insane. Quote:
Another thing plot/Meta wise. How exactly the Catostrophe happened is a bit more of plot importance than how the Fantastic 4 got into Space to be hit by cosmic rays. Since it's established right off the bat how it was done. This isn't the case in Log Horizon where the Catastrophe is a mystery to all parties involved, and figuring it out seems like it'll be an overarching mystery in this series. So not sure this is all that good of an analogy. ...no. "The Transhuman Robot Toaster God we totally created last week, did it by transmuting reality and building a giant supah computer out of thin air and teleporting people into it" theory is not more plausible than saying that Elvis, Espers or Aliens were the culprits. I mean, normally magic would be just as goofy, except this universe actually HAS magic...unless of course it was all the Transhuman Robot Toaster God making it LOOK like magic, but at that point we're talking about shody writing. I guess it just depends on whether or not you think that Toasters coming to life as Omniscient Transhuman Machine Gods at random is more likely than portals opening to magical worlds.
__________________
|
|||
2014-01-02, 02:58 | Link #93 | |||||||||||
Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Assuming they're people, or at least think like people, the question isn't likely to even keep them up at night all that long, even if they're aware of it, because there are more mundane issues to preoccupy their minds with. In essence they're subverting Putnam's Brain-in-a-Jar dilemma because it doesn't matter if the situation is real or false: what matters is how you deal with it. Actually, I'm rather surprised nobody has gone insane in Log Horizon because for the most part the characters seem mentally stable for such a dramatic shift in circumstances; that has nothing to do with virtual or otherwise, just the whole thing seems like it'd have sparked quite a few existential crisis regardless of the direction of thought. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||||||
2014-01-02, 04:44 | Link #95 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
|
Quote:
As for my theory, well, I'm glad you asked. It's an amazing theory you see, it answers everything and ties it all together! You see, it's obviously that.... whelp, I have no theory at all. I have a bunch of ideas that fit into catagory A. I have a bunch that fit into catagory B. I have a bunch which could fit into either. Then there's the bunch which don't really fit in either. |
|
2014-01-02, 05:25 | Link #96 | |
Dimension Exploiter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Arcane Sanctuary
|
So basically you are saying that there are not enough information to make a concrete assumption?
That is only right if you base what you know on the limited amount of information from the anime. So again I'm saying Quote:
__________________
|
|
2014-01-02, 05:31 | Link #97 | ||
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
2014-01-02, 05:32 | Link #98 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
|
While it's truth we can't make reliable assumption what exactly happaned bassed what we know. There is no problem ruling out things that COULDN'T possibly happen. That's how exclusion method works.
We don't know whether it's alternative world, but we do know it's virtualy impossible for it to be Virtual reality. |
2014-01-02, 10:04 | Link #99 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Virginia, USA
Age: 62
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2014-01-02, 11:40 | Link #100 | |
Adeptus Animus
Author
Join Date: Jan 2007
Age: 36
|
Quote:
That seems... somewhat counterproductive. Wasn't one of the reasons we created a separate thread for this topic to prevent clogging up the other threads? |
|
|
|