2008-03-19, 19:40 | Link #42 |
Obey the Darkly Cute ...
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the whole, I'd rather be in Kyoto ...
Age: 66
|
There was some MMO that made the insane decision to run their launcher as an ActiveX widget. It probably cost them over a third of their tech-savvy audience until they finally broke down and admitted it was a Bad Idea to use ActiveX on the Internet. By then their buzz-momentum was gone...
ActiveX is fabulous for company INTRAnets who have lots of apps and widgets built on an MS environment, say with Outlook and business apps - strictly for internal use. Its complete idiocy on the "wild" Internet as any survey of security community whizzes will tell you.
__________________
|
2008-03-19, 23:09 | Link #44 | |
9wiki
Scanlator
|
Quote:
No comments on ActiveX on the internal networks except to say that, for reasons I certainly don't need to go into, you'll never see it on mine. As for the thread topic of browsers: - Konqueror on KDE - Firefox on Windows and GNOME - Safari on OS X Opera sees no use from me because I find it to be ugly and clunky. I've been a fan for a long time (I remember the day when it was the browser advertised as fitting on a floppy; Handy when you're stuck on a 386!), but despite all the innovative features I just find it thoroughly unusable. That's really sad, because I want to love it. Internet Explorer is used only long enough to download another browser. I'd prevent any of my users from opening it at all if it weren't for all the business websites they must use IE to access. I cannot describe the depth of my seething hatred for IE. On any given web design project, over half my time is spent fixing IE bugs. Don't even get me started on all the security holes that have caused me problems over the years...
__________________
Last edited by Kyuusai; 2008-03-20 at 00:07. |
|
2008-03-19, 23:12 | Link #45 |
INTJ
IT Support
|
It would seem Safari has been made by Apple for Windows. I just recently got a "download and install" request by QuickTime/iTunes update for Safari. The brief description actually says it's the Windows version of the browser. Looks like Apple's jumped into the competition.
|
2008-03-19, 23:55 | Link #46 | |
Weapon of Mass Discussion
Fansubber
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, USA
|
Quote:
I suspect that I'm just saying things that you already know, but I feel the need to do so just in case because I find Opera the opposite of ugly and clunky. Ah well, perhaps this is just a case of different people finding enjoyment in different things.
__________________
|
|
2008-03-20, 00:09 | Link #47 |
Yummy, sweet and unyuu!!!
Join Date: Dec 2004
|
It is a shame that the general populace has gotten into such a way that defaults are used to gauge how a product looks or feels. Sure with physical things we don't want the hassle of modding them, but most programs are easily skinned to look or feel like another. But hey I'm guilty of it myself when I b**ch about the new GUI of Office 2k7
__________________
|
2008-03-20, 00:29 | Link #48 |
Kira_Naruto, the ecchi
Graphic Designer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: http://www.exciting-tits.com/
|
Well, default skin for FF feels like IE to me, so its really a - point when I've tried it out.
And right now, Opera already futhfill everything that I dont bother to find a replacement, apart from firing up FF to download stuff over megaupload
__________________
|
2008-03-20, 00:44 | Link #49 | |
9wiki
Scanlator
|
Quote:
Opera's default UI reminded me of the progression of the old MacOS UI: Innovative, elegant, and supremely usable when introduced, but not re-thought properly to accommodate the expanding features. After a while, it reminded me more of the new Netscape with its clutter. It's good to know that the UI layout can be changed so easily. However, I won't be going back to Opera while Free (as in libre) browsers remain as stable, advanced, and competitive as they are now. I am ALWAYS a fan of options, though. As far as I'm concerned, Opera always has a place on the internet. They'll also continue to receive my support for the tremendous work they've done in improving the state of web browsing.
__________________
|
|
2008-03-20, 00:54 | Link #50 | ||
Weapon of Mass Discussion
Fansubber
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, USA
|
Quote:
Quote:
I think you were just teasing me with that sentence. You don't really want to love it.
__________________
|
||
2008-03-20, 01:09 | Link #51 | ||
9wiki
Scanlator
|
Quote:
Quote:
And I do want to love Opera. I started using it in 1997, the year it hit the public. I couldn't always use it, whether due to rendering or JavaScript issues in the early days (they did fight the good fight against IE-only sites, bless them), or unavailability on Linux later. Until the day Firefox became usable, though, Opera was my preference if the sites I browsed worked in it. Even when I wasn't using it, I was admiring the work they did, both on the browser and personally, trying to fight the IE-only hordes and the Microsoft practices that fostered them.
__________________
Last edited by Kyuusai; 2008-03-20 at 01:29. |
||
2008-03-20, 02:59 | Link #52 | |
Weapon of Mass Discussion
Fansubber
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, USA
|
Quote:
According to Secunia Opera is free of all security vulnerabilities, something that no other browser can claim. They have a record of swiftly patching every single vulnerability no mater how minor. They are the only browser with no known security vulnerabilities, so that is worth something. Since Secunia is accepted by the industry, I think you shouldn't argue too much with my claim. As for bugs, yeah, they are certainly not bug free. I only claimed fewer. At the very least they don't have any bugs that a large part of their own community complained about for something like a year. That is really all I want to say on the subject since it is really much too subjective. Often when talking about bugs you are simply happy if the product doesn't have bugs that hurt the way you want to use it. With browsers a bug that annoys the heck out of one person will never even be noticed by another. That's why I removed that sentence and am very sorry that you started replying before I deleted it. I wish I hadn't posted it in the first place.
__________________
|
|
2008-03-20, 10:44 | Link #53 | |
Gregory House
IT Support
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2008-03-20, 11:20 | Link #54 |
Osana-Najimi Shipper
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mt. Ordeals
|
Way back when, I used a relatively unknown browser called Crazy Browser. And for the longest time I used it, as the UI was better than anything I've used in 2k2. Middle mouse clicks on links openning a new tab, tabbed browsing, being able to lock tabs, and built in pop up blocker was certainly a vast improvement from IE and Netscape from back then.
Downside was that CB isn't updated frequently (3 years just for the next beta?), so I suspect it's full of vulnerabilities. At that point, it was either Firefox or Opera. I tried Firefox first as it was much more popular than Opera, and used it for like a year or two. Something always irked me though about it, as you can't lock tabs with Firefox. And as old habits die hard (I usually have a ton of tabs open and if I want to close all but X number of them, I'm screwed with Firefox), I'm sticking with Opera and haven't looked back since. I do have both Firefox and Opera on my computer though, just because for some reason Vista doesn't like having Opera as my default browser no matter what I did. And while I'm very careful about what I click, I am not perfect. So whenever I misclick a link on say, my IRC client, I'd rather have firefox open up rather than IE. Not to mention that's one less thing I have to worry about if someone else decides to borrow my computer for surfing or whatnot.
__________________
|
2008-03-26, 01:56 | Link #55 |
Prospective Cog
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
I have Opera on my computer, and having played around with it quite a bit, I concluded that it is inherently better than Firefox in almost all categories, yet I still primarily use the latter. The thing is, for whatever reason, Firefox is still noticeably faster for me than every other browser I have tested. And speed being by far the most important factor I consider when using a browser has pretty much insured that I remain a Firefox user. I should probably mention that I have a Mac, so it might be an issue that is exclusive to those machines, although, strangely, the Apple-made Safari web browser is even slower than Opera.
|
2008-03-26, 02:47 | Link #56 | |
ISML Technical Staff
Graphic Designer
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
2008-08-29, 13:26 | Link #58 | |
Obey the Darkly Cute ...
Author
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the whole, I'd rather be in Kyoto ...
Age: 66
|
Quote:
Make sure there's not a typo in your URL that IE happens to be guessing correctly to correct? They use exactly the same methods and ports to connect.
__________________
|
|
2008-08-29, 23:00 | Link #59 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Trinidad.....anyone get me out of here !
|
I have the same problem also. It wont connect to any site but Explorer will. You cannot browse with firefox at all, other browers you can. I played around with it and now I cant even open it. I deleted the profile supposedly. What do I do?
|
2008-09-08, 08:57 | Link #60 |
Kira_Naruto, the ecchi
Graphic Designer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: http://www.exciting-tits.com/
|
I have a question to Firefox users. I'm looking for for FF plugin equivalent of Opera's notes.
What Opera's notes feature is simply allow you to CNP anything to the notes.. And since its CNP to a file, the stuff you copied to notes stays for use forever.
__________________
|
Tags |
browsers, software |
|
|