2008-04-30, 16:49 | Link #41 | |
moo
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Earth, the planet of stuff
Age: 30
|
Quote:
Which in that case, is ok. You wouldn't want the average slobby "Sixpack family" being the "Lucky specimens" for cloning. Well, anyways, I'm out of this thread. It seems like we've pretty much discussed that "This law isn't banning anime/manga in total". Among other things. |
|
2008-04-30, 18:49 | Link #42 |
Observer/Bookman wannabe
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Singapore
Age: 38
|
Well, time for political/psychological manga to hit the UK, hard. I suggest Urasawa Naoki's Monster as the leader of the pack. Seriously, anyone who thinks that manga/anime is all about "in-your-face" stuff should look at Saiyuki and Nana.
Since the law is vague, the "interpretation" lawsuits will be fought. We'll see how it goes. |
2008-05-02, 12:15 | Link #43 | |
Story Master
|
Quote:
|
|
2008-05-02, 12:46 | Link #44 |
i don't work for points
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: behind you in the shadows
Age: 38
|
many people thinks that our behavur changes due to a video game or a movie or a music or even stories.
my opinion is that it is up to us weather thay influence our behaveur or not. becuse most of my friends like shooting games. when thay were kids thay always buy gun toys such as water gun, paint gun, sound gun, light gun and all the games that thay play is shooting. after thay finished high school thay entered the military. the military gave them VR training and my friends were the best thay never got shoot and thay always aim at the head. but when the military putthem in a real battlefield training with paint guns my friends were the worst thay couldn't shoot at anyone. |
2008-05-02, 13:55 | Link #45 |
Moving in circles
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Singapore
Age: 49
|
This is the UK....where people have a healthy respect for freedom of speech and expression, regardless whether this is actually the case on the ground. I find it hard to believe that this legislation would be used the way the OP suggested. Any government that attempts to do so would be laughed out of office.
Look, this is a country where people have no qualms about taking the mickey out of any authority figure, ranging from the Queen to the local mayor. No one is sacrosanct. The higher you are, the more a Brit would love to see you fall. If the British police were to start arresting people for possession of "shocking" anime/manga, I think it won't be long before "library task forces" start appearing in the UK as well. |
2008-05-02, 14:05 | Link #46 | |
Youkai of Coincidence
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Border of Common Sense
Age: 34
|
Quote:
|
|
2008-05-02, 14:25 | Link #47 | ||
Love Yourself
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northeast USA
Age: 38
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
2008-05-02, 18:40 | Link #49 | |
♪♫ Maya Iincho ♩♬
Artist
|
I went around reading some articles and other forum post about the "UK Anime Ban" but I can't really seem to find and sufficient info >.<
From the info I can collect here I can't really made an accurate decision. Quote:
The only thing I can think of adding is; Will banning porn of any kind prevent it from happening. It almost seems similar to the Probation in the US.
__________________
Last edited by Aoie_Emesai; 2008-05-02 at 23:02. |
|
2008-05-03, 18:06 | Link #55 | |
~ You're dead ^__^* ~
Graphic Designer
|
Quote:
I rofled at the comments though...yippie... The CCTV thing you brought up also wins. Maybe I should pity myself for being here
__________________
|
|
2008-05-03, 21:28 | Link #58 | |
Inactive
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Quote:
Clause (2) is used to limits jurisdiction of clause (1), thereby limiting jurisdiction of this law and preventing it from any serious abuse. Its also one of few clauses which can't have a wide-range of interpretation. If clause (2) had defined “extreme pornographic image” as pornographic or an extreme image then this law would have been capable of doing exactly what the OP said and more. Personally, I find clause 6 (d) very appealing since it provides some new rights to wildlife/"animals".
__________________
|
|
2008-05-03, 23:03 | Link #60 |
eyewitness
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
If you really don't understand what is wrong with a legal text containing a statement "a <adjective1> <adjective2> <noun> is a <noun> which is both <adjective2> and <adjective1> <noun>." then I can't help you. Maybe you can help us improving the Declaration of Human Rights a bit? I find it seriously lacking. One could start with inserting
Article 19a "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression." means that everyone has the right to freedom of (1) opinion, and (2) expression. Maybe that way this principle can even be understood by the people who made the law we're talking about.
__________________
|
Tags |
united kingdom |
|
|