View Single Post
Old 2016-06-23, 04:42   Link #89
karice67
さっく♥ゆうきゃん♥ほそやん
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: in the land down under...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReddyRedWolf View Post
An entire city on Alfheim was wiped out by Var syndrome. Yes it is a WMD. Count the numerous acts of violence seen on the show causing civilian casualties.

The Kingdom of Wind is deliberately spreading Var or haven't you heard what Roid said it wouldn't matter if the NUN finally caught up with their scheme as they've spread enough apples and water for a ban not to matter.

The Kingdom of Wind did this for years even before they declared war.
Ok, so let's get to what Var is. Is Var caused by a biological agent that is indiscriminate and destroys most if not all the people it infects?

In episode 9, we learn that the Var Syndrome is probably caused "when the fold bacteria that are living parasitically in a person's cells transmit and amplify intense emotions through hyperspace, making the individual behave violently."

In other words, the bacteria themselves don't cause the problem, it's emotions that cause it.

Windermere has spread the Var bacteria so that they can deliberately use it to control people, rather than killing them.

So again, how does this fit into the definition of WMD, given that it's not indiscriminate, but deliberate?

======

Just so this is clear: I'm not trying to lambast anyone for thinking that Windermere is doing something that you find utterly unforgivable in a moral sense. What I am questioning is the way that some people are using the term "WMD" to excuse themselves from using logic to state their position. Instead, they're using a term so politicised that anyone who disagrees is automatically labelled as being 'immoral'.

Criticise (and 'hate on') Windermere all you want. But if you're going to use political terms, then be prepared to defend how you are using them.
__________________

How Suetsugu Yuki drew the cover for Chihayafuru volume 34

Interview translations etc

You must free yourself from that illusion,
from the illusion that a story must have a beginning and an end.


"No, you are not entitled to your opinion... You are only entitled to what you can argue for.”
- Patrick Stokes

karice67 is offline